![]() ![]() Brad Pfaff, voted against the bill with all Republicans in support. "They really don’t know what they’re voting on.”Īll Democrats in the Senate, except for Sen. “A lot of people are very confused what the two questions are,” Carpenter said in a news conference. Tim Carpenter accused Republicans of using the proposed amendment to bolster conservative turnout in the pivotal state Supreme Court election and said lawmakers were confusing voters by using a separate measure to clarify when the amendment would apply. The governor's spokesperson, Britt Cudaback, did not immediately respond to an email Wednesday or to two emails over the past week asking whether Evers plans to sign off on the bill.ĭemocratic Sen. ![]() Every judge can decide what they think serious harm is every judge can decide what he thinks violent crime is,” she said in a news conference. “If he does veto it and the constitutional amendment passes, then it’s kind of the Wild West. Cindi Duchow, the bill’s sponsor in the Assembly, said she was confident Evers will sign the bill into law. Evers cannot veto a constitutional amendment. After that, the measure would go into effect only if voters pass two bail questions on the April 4 ballot. The bill still needs the approval of Democratic Gov. Opponents have said the list is too broad and includes offenses that should not make it more difficult for people to get out on bail, such as watching a cockfight, violating a court order against contacting members of a criminal gang or leaving a firearm where a child gains access to it. The GOP-backed bill would set a new definition for use with the bail amendment, designating more than 100 offenses such as homicide, sexual assault, arson, stalking or human trafficking as violent crimes. State law offers three definitions of violent crime. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |